Recently, four senior judges of the Supreme Court publicly commented against the chief Justice by organizing press conference. The judges say that everything is not right in the supreme judiciary. If the situation is not brought up, the Supreme Court may also pose a threat to democracy.
It is noteworthy that coriander has never generated such a situation before in the country's history. The Supreme Court is an institution that is deeply confident to the citizens of the country, so question marks on this institution may weaken the confidence of the citizens of the entire country. In the Supreme Court, the judges also have additional pressure on the top as 25 justices are currently in the Supreme Court of 31 positions approved.
Major reason of differences arising among Supreme Court judges:
- The four senior judges, which were publicly held by the press conference, Allegations that the chief justices are arbitrary in the case distanced and are sending out cases near the bench of their choice.
- According to the tradition, the Chief justice is the administrative head of the Supreme Court and the related cases by wise Report are sent to bench related to the matter. The judges above believe that the Chief Justice is not following the tradition.
- According to the judges around the Supreme Court there is a lot that is not supposed to happen. Although these judges did not tell him what to do.
- According to the judges, the Chief Justice is the first in equal judges, not least or more, while the chief justices are behaving as they are best.
Solution of these types of differences:
- By the four senior judges of the Supreme Court, the chief justices who have been charged are serious but may not be given any administrative action on the Chief Justice because of these charges, because the chief justice can be removed only by impeachment.
- Because this case cannot be expected from the government for meddling, it would be advisable to see the Supreme Court's prestige, so that the chief Justice should carry out the initiative and try to bring in transparent solutions to all the judges together.
Conclusion:-
We can conclude that the differences arising between the Supreme Court judges is of concern is to solve as soon as this conflict in order to safeguard democracy and maintain the trust of the citizens in the judiciary.
