There are many legal and ethical aspects in this issue which can be understood as follows-
1. The first issue is the right or wrong presentation of historical events.
2. The second issue is of democracy versus mobility.
3. The third issue is legal because it is wrong to protest against the film's performance even after the permission of the Central Board of Film Certification and Supreme Court.
The following steps need to be taken to prevent recurrence of such incidents -
Awareness needs to be taken so that no filmmaker or director can tamper with historical events. It is known that in recent times there have been many such films which have to be earned. These facts are made by tampering so that viewers can be entertained.
Public exhibition of films in the country occurs after the permission of the Central Board of Film Certification. Therefore, the Central Board of Film Certification should be separated from politics by making it a fair and complete autonomous body. It is known that at present the Central Board of Film Certification is under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of the Government of India.
The crowd of youth who were being held hostage for the film's performance was getting inspired by the ideology of a particular political party. Such young people must be turned towards creativity by providing education, skill and employment.
The general public will have to be aware of this that they do not pay attention to the rumors. It is known that many people were involved in the protest just because other people were opposing this movie. Such a situation will be avoided.
In this regard, we have to take care of the court's dignity also. It is known that even after the court order, people are stuck on the demand to ban the film's performance.
It can be controlled to recapitulate such incidents by properly applying the above mentioned suggestions.
