At the beginning of human civilization, humans used to hunt animals for their own needs, but later he learned to follow the animals. Thus the process of living with humans and animals started and human and animal became an integral part of each other.
In time animals became considered an integral part of culture. For example, in the Harappa, the humpback bull and the cow was highly valued during the Vedic period. Similarly, people consider Jallikattu as part of their culture. Under Jallikattu, the bull is uncontrolled in many ways and an uncontrolled bull is attempted by the people.
During this process, those who control the bulls also have to face serious injuries, so the organizations working for animal rights have been demanding to stop Jallikattu. Above all, the judiciary has also put up such incidents like Jallikattu in Dharmasankati because this event is wrong in both ethical and constitutional forms.
How did Jallikattu create moral crisis in front of the judiciary?
What can be considered ethical if a brutalized behavior is done with oxen in Jallikattu.
Whether a person has the right to do violence against animals or the Cruelty against Animals has been completely prohibited by the Animal Cruelty Prevention Act of 1960.
What constitutional crisis has caused to Jallikattu in front of the judiciary?
Can Jallikattu be considered as part of the culture under Article 29 of the Constitution? This is a disputed point before the court.
Second is an animal also being given the right to live a dignified life under Article 21 as is provided to human beings also?
Conclusion:
As much as necessary culture is needed for a civilized and cultured society, there is also compassionate behavior with the necessary animals. Therefore, Jallikattu should be organized in a decent manner so that animal rights are not harmed in some way.
